The Downsize DC Army – 29,403 strong!
New Registrations Letters Sent
So far this month: 214 36,870
Last month: 263 62,240

Downsize DC Co-founders

Jim Babka
Harry Browne (1933-2006)
Steve Dasbach
Perry Willis

DownsizeDC.org Founders Committee

Patrons & Sponsors

Winona Christeson
Steve Fox
Leo Hamel
Vince Hanke
Ken A. Heinemann
David J. Kubacki
David W. Landram
Bill W. Long
David R. Mason
Joseph Plummer
Sheldon Rose
Ted A. Semon
Jeffrey S. Skinner
Steve Stewart
J. Billy Verplanck

Associates

Stephanie Adams
Henry Ahler
Paul J. Arends
Kathleen Austin
Dwight E. Baker
Charlie Beaird
Howard W. Beatty
Robert G. Beebe
Michael Benoit
Ian Bernard
Frank Bowman
David Bywaters
Gregory F. Camia
Robert Candioglos
Laura Carno
W.E. Chilton
Craig B. Coogan
David Corbin
Sean R. Coughlin
Earl Cowherd
Susan M. Cox
Martin Dale
Elaine M. DiMasi
Daniel J. Dunn
Travis Ebert
Paul D. Eccles
Robert E. Fritts
Clarence Gardner
George F. Gardner
David K. Garretson
A. Faye Gilmore
Michael Guin
Adam Haman
Derald Hawkes
Ed & Wendy Heaphy
Mark L. Hepfinger
Dick Holic
Steven R. Hooley
Sherry L. Hunter
John Inks
Sandra Kallander
Greg J. Kerkow
Thomas O. Kershaw
Andrew Le Cureaux
Myron Ledworowski
Dan Leviton
Alice J. Lillie
Joy Linsley
Billy D. Lowe
Bryan J. Luff
David Macko
Robert Moore
Wanda Myers
Dane Owen
Rudolf D. & Jere E. Pabst
David Page
Leif Pedersen
Tor Perkins
Benjamin J. Quatrano
Allen Salveson
Robert D. Schaffer
James Schwartz
James Sherman
Scott Shock
Robban A. Sica
Alan Starner
Craig Stephens
Harold Stevens
John C. Tate
Eric R. Theiner
Brian Thomson
Randy Ullom
Fred Van Dyk
John Watson
Patricia L. Wedel
George R. Whitfield
Richard A. Wiggins
Edwin & Edith Wisian
DownsizeDC.org
April 13, 2009
Posted by Jim Babka

Quote of the Day: "Government cripples you, then hands you a crutch and says, 'See, if it wasn't for us, you couldn't walk." -- Harry Browne (1933-2006), co-founder of Downsize DC

Subject: The not so mysterious case of the vanishing doctors

In case you missed it . . .

A survey by The Physician's Foundation finds that nearly HALF of primary care doctors plan to reduce or eliminate their practices in the next three years!

The survey also gives the reasons . . .

* Too much non-clinical paperwork
* Difficulty getting reimbursed
* Too much government regulation
* Lack of time (caused by the above problems) to form patient relationships

These problems exist because the government has corrupted the nature of health insurance.

* Insurance is supposed to cover rare but expensive procedures
* But various government policies have made health insurance cover the medical equivalents of oil changes and tire rotations
* This means that most medical care is paid for by the government, or by insurance companies, and not by the people actually seeking the care
* This causes people to over-use medical services, and doctors to order questionable procedures
* That causes both insurance companies and the government to limit their costs by second-guessing every decision your doctor makes
* This burden of regulation leads to piles of non-clinical paperwork and difficulty getting reimbursed

But it gets worse. Health care prices are actually set by the government . . .

* The government funds HALF of all medical care
* This gives the government huge clout as the largest purchaser of health care
* The government uses this clout to limit what it's willing to pay for every medical procedure
* The insurance companies use these government prices to set their own prices
* If these fixed prices are too low, shortages result, AND DOCTORS VANISH!

But that's only the beginning . . .

If your health insurance is tied to your employer -- if you risk catastrophe because losing your job means losing your health insurance -- you can thank the government for that. Federal tax policies created the incentives that caused your health insurance to be tied to your job.

But if you don't have employer-provided health insurance, and find coverage too expensive to buy on your own, you can thank the government for that too. State and federal laws mandate that insurance policies cover everything under the sun, making it hard to buy affordable major medical coverage.

The politicians could easily fix these problems by . . .

* Providing tax refunds for all health care expenses, including insurance premiums
* Allowing insurance companies to compete with different policies at different prices by ending mandates on what all health insurance must cover
* Funding Health Savings Accounts for Medicare recipients so they'll have more incentives to be frugal

The solution to our health care problems is less meddling by the politicians, not more. The case of the vanishing doctors isn't mysterious. The politicians did it, and they want to do more of what caused it!

Send your Congressional employees instructions asking them reduce their meddling in health care. Use your personal comments to mention the arguments in this Dispatch (you could just cut and paste if you want). If you've used our Educate the Powerful System before, do the following . . .

* Go to the DownsizeDC.org home page
* Log-in using the log-in button at the right of the navigation bar near the top of the page
* Scroll down and click on the link for campaign number 16. Federal Health Care Monopoly . . . First Do No Harm (Here's the direct link)
* Scroll down to the form at the bottom of the page and send your message

If you're sending your very FIRST message to Congress using our system, click on this link, scroll down to the form, fill it out, and send your message.

Thank you for being a part of the growing Downsize DC Army.

Jim Babka
President
DownsizeDC.org, Inc.

1 comments posted so far
dark1rep
April 13, 2009 02:21 PM (EDT)
In this campaign, as in most, I question the passivity of our repsonses to Congressional representatives. You said:

Send your Congressional employees instructions asking them reduce their meddling in health care.

Ask them? My employer does not plead with me to do my job. Sometimes my assignments, tasks, are framed as a request, however, that does not imply I can say "No." Other times, I am told what to do, also removing any negative reponse from me.

If our representatives are truely our employees, why do we frame our demands as requests? Does this not invite or even promote a negative response from those representatives?

If we are presenting our demands as requests out of some antiquated tradition of respect for the office holder, I would counter that respect is earned and they have yet to have done that with me.