The Downsize DC Army – 30,022 strong!
New Registrations Letters Sent
So far this month: 4 386
Last month: 321 50,538

Downsize DC Co-founders

Jim Babka
Harry Browne
(1933–2006)

Steve Dasbach
Perry Willis

DownsizeDC.org Founders Committee

Patrons & Sponsors

Winona Christeson
Steve Fox
Leo Hamel
Vince Hanke
Ken A. Heinemann
David J. Kubacki
David W. Landram
Bill W. Long
David R. Mason
Joseph Plummer
Sheldon Rose
Ted A. Semon
Jeffrey S. Skinner
Steve Stewart
J. Billy Verplanck

Associates

Stephanie Adams
Henry Ahler
Paul J. Arends
Kathleen Austin
Dwight E. Baker
Charlie Beaird
Howard W. Beatty
Robert G. Beebe
Michael Benoit
Ian Bernard
Frank Bowman
David Bywaters
Gregory F. Camia
Robert Candioglos
Laura Carno
W.E. Chilton
Craig B. Coogan
David Corbin
Sean R. Coughlin
Earl Cowherd
Susan M. Cox
Martin Dale
Elaine M. DiMasi
Daniel J. Dunn
Travis Ebert
Paul D. Eccles
Robert E. Fritts
Clarence Gardner
George F. Gardner
David K. Garretson
A. Faye Gilmore
Michael Guin
Adam Haman
Derald Hawkes
Ed & Wendy Heaphy
Mark L. Hepfinger
Dick Holic
Steven R. Hooley
Sherry L. Hunter
John Inks
Sandra Kallander
Greg J. Kerkow
Thomas O. Kershaw
Andrew Le Cureaux
Myron Ledworowski
Dan Leviton
Alice J. Lillie
Joy Linsley
Billy D. Lowe
Bryan J. Luff
David Macko
Robert Moore
Wanda Myers
Dane Owen
Rudolf D. & Jere E. Pabst
David Page
Leif Pedersen
Tor Perkins
Benjamin J. Quatrano
Allen Salveson
Robert D. Schaffer
James Schwartz
James Sherman
Scott Shock
Robban A. Sica
Alan Starner
Craig Stephens
Harold Stevens
John C. Tate
Eric R. Theiner
Brian Thomson
Randy Ullom
Fred Van Dyk
John Watson
Patricia L. Wedel
George R. Whitfield
Richard A. Wiggins
Edwin & Edith Wisian
DownsizeDC.org
May 14, 2009
Posted by James Leroy Wilson

Quote of the Day: "If Obama scews up health care where will the Canadians go?" -- sign seen at a protest event

Subject: NEW CAMPAIGN! The dirty secret about expensive health insurance

Do you need health insurance coverage for . . .

  • Maternity care, if you're a single male
  • Infertility, if you don't want a family
  • Alcoholism, if you don't drink

If you live in New York state then you (or your employer) must pay for all these things, by law, or go without health insurance.

It's even worse in New Jersey, where the law only permits four basic health insurance plans, each with its own cluster of mandatory coverages. As a result, family premiums run from $2,631.41 to $6,467.58, per month. (Source: "America's Health Care Crisis Solved" by J. Patrick Rooney and Dan Perrin, page 113).

People who can't afford those premiums (and few can) must go without health insurance.

Similar situations exist in other states . . .

Health insurance is too expensive because the politicians have made it that way. They've bowed to lobbyists who want to use the coercive power of government to mandate coverage for . . .

  • The medical equivalent of oil changes and tire rotations
  • Or things like maternity care for single males, infertility treatments for people who don't want families, and alcoholism therapy for people who don't drink.

These laws corrupt the very nature of insurance. Insurance is supposed to cover unlikely but expensive procedures, NOT simple blood tests, or massages, or acupuncture, or chiropractic adjustments, or anything else we could afford to pay out of pocket, if only so many of us weren't being gouged by legally inflated insurance premiums.

Now the politicians want to redesign the entire American health care system from the top down, in one giant step, to supposedly fix a problem they created in the first place. But, instead of enacting a "grand plan" that will impact, and potentially harm, everyone, and that we may never get rid of once it's in place, the politicians should start by taking a few simple steps to clean up the mess they've made.

Fortunately, not all states have mandatory coverage laws as bad as New York and New Jersey. True major medical coverage is still available in many states, but only if you happen to live in one of those places. Congress can fix this problem very easily. They should pass a law permitting you or your employer to buy insurance regulated by other states. This would . . .

  • Enable you or your employer to shop for better deals across state lines
  • Put pressure on state governments to liberalize their insurance regulations

Use our quick and easy Educate the Powerful System to tell your Congressional employees to pass such a law.

Use your personal comments to make some of the points we make in this Dispatch. You can cut and paste from the intro text on the campaign page if you want.

Our goal this month is to pound Congress with  more than 31,730 messages. That means we must hit Congress with 1,479 messages today.

Thank you for being a part of the growing Downsize DC Army. To see how much we're growing please check out the Keeping Score report below my signature.

Jim Babka
President, DownsizeDC.org, Inc.

Keeping Score

We've grown again, by 33 new members yesterday, and 932 so far this year. The Downsize DC Army now stands at 25,281, which is 28% of the way to 26,000!

YOU can make the army grow even faster by following our quick and easy instructions for personalized recruiting.

We can also grow faster by mailing recruitment letters to potential DC Downsizers. If you can start a monthly credit card pledge to help fund these mailings please tell us on the secure contribution form if its okay to publish your name here . . .

NEW MONTHLY PLEDGERS IN MAY: Nancy Kovar, Ryan Ackroyd, WM Michael O'Brien, John C Houghton, James Alan Speedie, ONE unlisted

Or, if you'd prefer to make a one-time donation, please let us know if its okay to publish your name here . . .

NEW ONE TIME DONORS IN MAY: Ernest P. Eusea, Chris Reulman, David Anthony, Christopher T Wagner, Thomas Sartwelle, Jr, FOUR unlisted

2 comments posted so far
Brooks
May 14, 2009 04:36 PM (EDT)
Allowing people and employers to buy insurance across state lines will do more harm then good. As healthy people who have no or few medical issues, ie single healthy adults with no kids, buy insurance cheaper in other states with less mandatory coverages the parents with children, pregnant women, and the sick will be left behind.

As this increases, premiums for all those left behind will increase and more and more individuals and companies will be priced out of health insurance.

For those healthy within the state that didn't have insurance they might be able to get insurance more cheaply across state lines, but you will also lose more insurance coverage on the sick, pregnant and those with children. A possible effect of zero on the uninsured rate, except that more healthy single people will have insurance and more sick, pregnant women and children will not be covered.
Alin_S
May 15, 2009 03:10 PM (EDT)
The comment posted says this action would make things worse for children and pregnant women. There is a lack of honest discussion on the topic of health insurance. As soon as someone speaks on it and points to govt interference with the markets and its effects on the market, the knee-jerk reaction is to use the "poor" and the children as reasons why we shouldn't stop to think and use some common sense in our decision making process. These are topics that we need to investigate and understand before allowing govt to overhaul the system just in the name of the "poor" and children. And then we can all be poor together.