The Downsize DC Army – 30,022 strong!
New Registrations Letters Sent
So far this month: 4 386
Last month: 321 50,538

Downsize DC Co-founders

Jim Babka
Harry Browne
(1933–2006)

Steve Dasbach
Perry Willis

DownsizeDC.org Founders Committee

Patrons & Sponsors

Winona Christeson
Steve Fox
Leo Hamel
Vince Hanke
Ken A. Heinemann
David J. Kubacki
David W. Landram
Bill W. Long
David R. Mason
Joseph Plummer
Sheldon Rose
Ted A. Semon
Jeffrey S. Skinner
Steve Stewart
J. Billy Verplanck

Associates

Stephanie Adams
Henry Ahler
Paul J. Arends
Kathleen Austin
Dwight E. Baker
Charlie Beaird
Howard W. Beatty
Robert G. Beebe
Michael Benoit
Ian Bernard
Frank Bowman
David Bywaters
Gregory F. Camia
Robert Candioglos
Laura Carno
W.E. Chilton
Craig B. Coogan
David Corbin
Sean R. Coughlin
Earl Cowherd
Susan M. Cox
Martin Dale
Elaine M. DiMasi
Daniel J. Dunn
Travis Ebert
Paul D. Eccles
Robert E. Fritts
Clarence Gardner
George F. Gardner
David K. Garretson
A. Faye Gilmore
Michael Guin
Adam Haman
Derald Hawkes
Ed & Wendy Heaphy
Mark L. Hepfinger
Dick Holic
Steven R. Hooley
Sherry L. Hunter
John Inks
Sandra Kallander
Greg J. Kerkow
Thomas O. Kershaw
Andrew Le Cureaux
Myron Ledworowski
Dan Leviton
Alice J. Lillie
Joy Linsley
Billy D. Lowe
Bryan J. Luff
David Macko
Robert Moore
Wanda Myers
Dane Owen
Rudolf D. & Jere E. Pabst
David Page
Leif Pedersen
Tor Perkins
Benjamin J. Quatrano
Allen Salveson
Robert D. Schaffer
James Schwartz
James Sherman
Scott Shock
Robban A. Sica
Alan Starner
Craig Stephens
Harold Stevens
John C. Tate
Eric R. Theiner
Brian Thomson
Randy Ullom
Fred Van Dyk
John Watson
Patricia L. Wedel
George R. Whitfield
Richard A. Wiggins
Edwin & Edith Wisian
DownsizeDC.org
October 18, 2009
Posted by James Leroy Wilson

Thanks to everyone who forwarded their Congressional replies to our three questions in the Mexican Civil War campaign. As you may recall, the questions were:

You've sworn an oath to protect the Constitution, so could you please answer three questions. 1. Where does the Constitution authorize the federal government to wage a War on Drugs? 2. If alcohol prohibition required a Constitutional Amendment, how does prohibiting other drugs NOT require a Constitutional Amendment? 3. Shouldn't we be allowed to learn what works best by having states with different drug laws, or NO drug laws, in keeping with the 10th Amendment? I would appreciate an honest, thoughtful response.

Regrettably, no response we've received actually answered our questions. Most members ignored the Constitutional question and trumpeted their support for the Drug War.

For instance, Sen. Lieberman wrote to Connecticut Downsizers, "I regret that we see this issue from different points of view." He then detailed his support for various aspects of the Drug War.

But the question isn't whether the War on Drugs is good policy, the question is where does the Constitution authorize it.

Sen. Kohl danced around the Constitution. He wrote,

Our founding fathers left the Constitution open for interpretation, and knew that there was still more to be outlined when it was ratified in 1787. Amendments and interpretations of the Constitution are taken very seriously by government officials in all three branches of government.

Yes, but Senator, what is YOUR interpretation?

If members of Congress can't justify their actions on Constitutional grounds, they are essentially advocating tyranny and lawlessness. That's why we will keep pressing. If friends of liberty and the Constitution provide growing, relentless, resistance-numbing pressure, Congress will bend in our direction.

We will pursue this issue by demanding Congress pass the Enumerated Powers Act (EPA). You can send a letter telling Congress of your support for the EPA here.

And, if you do receive a response from your representative or senator about the Constitutionality of the Drug War, we'd like to hear about it in the comments section below.

Filed under Civil Liberties, Health
0 comments posted so far