The Downsize DC Army – 30,022 strong!
New Registrations Letters Sent
So far this month: 4 386
Last month: 321 50,538

Downsize DC Co-founders

Jim Babka
Harry Browne
(1933–2006)

Steve Dasbach
Perry Willis

DownsizeDC.org Founders Committee

Patrons & Sponsors

Winona Christeson
Steve Fox
Leo Hamel
Vince Hanke
Ken A. Heinemann
David J. Kubacki
David W. Landram
Bill W. Long
David R. Mason
Joseph Plummer
Sheldon Rose
Ted A. Semon
Jeffrey S. Skinner
Steve Stewart
J. Billy Verplanck

Associates

Stephanie Adams
Henry Ahler
Paul J. Arends
Kathleen Austin
Dwight E. Baker
Charlie Beaird
Howard W. Beatty
Robert G. Beebe
Michael Benoit
Ian Bernard
Frank Bowman
David Bywaters
Gregory F. Camia
Robert Candioglos
Laura Carno
W.E. Chilton
Craig B. Coogan
David Corbin
Sean R. Coughlin
Earl Cowherd
Susan M. Cox
Martin Dale
Elaine M. DiMasi
Daniel J. Dunn
Travis Ebert
Paul D. Eccles
Robert E. Fritts
Clarence Gardner
George F. Gardner
David K. Garretson
A. Faye Gilmore
Michael Guin
Adam Haman
Derald Hawkes
Ed & Wendy Heaphy
Mark L. Hepfinger
Dick Holic
Steven R. Hooley
Sherry L. Hunter
John Inks
Sandra Kallander
Greg J. Kerkow
Thomas O. Kershaw
Andrew Le Cureaux
Myron Ledworowski
Dan Leviton
Alice J. Lillie
Joy Linsley
Billy D. Lowe
Bryan J. Luff
David Macko
Robert Moore
Wanda Myers
Dane Owen
Rudolf D. & Jere E. Pabst
David Page
Leif Pedersen
Tor Perkins
Benjamin J. Quatrano
Allen Salveson
Robert D. Schaffer
James Schwartz
James Sherman
Scott Shock
Robban A. Sica
Alan Starner
Craig Stephens
Harold Stevens
John C. Tate
Eric R. Theiner
Brian Thomson
Randy Ullom
Fred Van Dyk
John Watson
Patricia L. Wedel
George R. Whitfield
Richard A. Wiggins
Edwin & Edith Wisian
DownsizeDC.org
November 23, 2009
Posted by Jim Babka

The Senate voted to consider Harry Reid's healthcare bill on Saturday night.

We must say, first of all, that there's no need to panic. Keep in mind . . .

* The Senate did NOT pass the bill, it only agreed to end a filibuster that prevented the bill from being considered.
* There will be a debate and a consideration of amendments to the bill after Thanksgiving
* There will be another filibuster to prevent final passage of the bill, and breaking a filibuster requires 60 votes, which means . . .
* Final passage of the bill still requires 60 votes

That said, we are angry that this bill is moving forward. We must respond to this vote as we responded to the passage in the House of Pelosi's healthcare bill two weeks ago . . .

* Thank the 39 Senators who voted against consideration of Reid's healthcare bill
* Spank the 60 Senators who voted for it
* Copy your Representatives on these messages so they'll be reminded of where you stand

Do this . . .

* See how your Senator voted: http://tinyurl.com/yd8s2pv
* Use our Educate the Powerful System to send your "thank or spank" letter to Congress

We believe it is especially important for citizens to "spank" Senators who expressed opposition to the bill because of the public option, yet voted to consider it anyway. These include most prominently:

* Bill Nelson (NE)
* Blanche Lincoln(AR)
* Mary Landrieu (LA)
* Joe Lieberman (CT)

If your two Senators voted in opposite directions, you can say something like this: "I thank Senator X for voting against cloture on Senator Reid's terrible healthcare bill, and I am very disappointed that Senator Y voted to move forward with it."

Because there are lots of combinations of Senators, where one voted for, another against, or both voted the same, we can't offer a one-size-fits-all letter today. So, here's a generic letter with talking points you may want to use in your own letter . . .

The American people do not support the liberty-crushing, debt-exploding, socializing healthcare bills Congress is considering. I therefore thank those Senators who voted against consideration of Sen. Reid's healthcare vote on Saturday night.

To those who voted to consider Sen. Reid's bill, let me suggest:

* although you willfully refuse to recognize that government interference has been the cause of exploding healthcare costs;
* although you refuse to even consider the possibility that LESS government is the solution to the healthcare crisis;
* although you don't recognize the fundamental wrongness of forcing individuals to purchase government-controlled health insurance they don't want;
* perhaps the intense opposition of the American people, and your own political self-interest, will finally persuade you to abandon your support for this bill.

I am especially angry with Senators who expressed opposition to the bill, yet still voted to break this filibuster. They spouted nonsense like "moving the debate forward" and "an opportunity to make improvements." http://www.aapsonline.org/newsoftheday/00650#more-650

They had the power to stop what they said was an unacceptable bill, but they didn't.

Frankly, I suspect they are feigning "opposition" to the bill as leverage. I suspect they will be bribed to win their support of the final bill.

It happened already to win Sen. Landrieu's support. A promise of an additional $100 million to her state caused her to break the filibuster. http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2009/11/the-100-million-health-care-vote.html

The American people will be watching carefully to see how many similar deals are brokered to win passage of this "healthcare reform."

It's in your interest, and your party's interest, to oppose Sen. Reid's boondoggle bill. We demand that you do.

END LETTER

Tell the Senate to oppose Reid's bill at every turn, and to prevent its progress.

Thank you for being a DC Downsizer.

Jim Babka
President
DownsizeDC.org, Inc.
 

 

Filed under Health, Downsizer Dispatch
2 comments posted so far
niffrig
November 23, 2009 02:24 PM (EST)
Why would you use a URL shortening service in a post like this that isn't limited constrained to a limited character count? My work blocks URL shorteners for (what I consider misguided) security reasons so I will have to remember to re-check your site when I get home tonight.
Enrique
November 24, 2009 04:14 AM (EST)
But who wants this Health care? Almost everybody is protesting regarding this. Is this the Democratic way of Obama? You can't get really small secured loans – for a loan to be secured, it has to be backed by collateral. So if you're looking to buy a house, or a car, then by all means you can get secured loans. However, if you're looking for a small loan of some quick cash, like to cover a flat tire or a trip to the doctor, then secured loans probably aren't the answer – for one, they don't come that small, and for two, the bank will take forever. In that case, you want something closer to a payday loan. A payday loan, as everyone knows, are small loans that don't required collateral, so they aren't secured loans.